Google: Set Top Box King?
Largely overlooked in the initial reaction to Google’s proposed $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility is the deal’s potential impact on the cable set top box business. When Motorola split the company in two, the decidedly un-mobile set top box group (formerly General Instrument) went to the Mobility unit. The U.S. market for set top boxes for cable and cable-like services, such as Verizon’s FiOS, is split between Motorola and Cisco (the former Atlanta Scientific.)
The cable box has been a huge impediment to the development of really practical systems to get internet video onto living room TVs. Motorola and Cisco build the boxes their cable provider customers want and that means very limited integration with the internet. In the view of the cable companies, Facebook and Twitter are fine, but Netflix and Hulu most certainly are not. And while it is possible to build a CableCARD-equipped device that allows customers to receive both cable and internet TV on a third-party box, resistance by the cable companies and the failure of the Federal Communications commission to enforce its own rules has resulted in a minuscule market for these products.
Google TV is a great example of a product that was choked by the set top box monopoly. The closest Google could come to integrating cable into its supposedly comprehensive service was to use a ridiculous and antiquated device called an IR blaster to let the Google TV unit control the set top box. IR blaster-based products have been around for years, but have never won favor from consumers (for one thing, at least in my house, the little IR sending units keep falling off the cable box.)
So what would Google do with its new presence in the living room if this deal goes through. It could simply follow the Motorola course and go on making the set top boxes that cable operators want, but that seems profoundly un-Googley. Or it could strike a new course, offering the first mass-market home entertainment united that fully integrate cable and internet services. That could revolutionize the business–or drive all the cable operators to Cisco, which has never shown much inclination to rock this particular boat. My bet is that Google will at least try to build the product that Google TV should have been in the first place.
Related Columns and Analysis:
- Why Google had to buy Motorola
- Can Google TV be Saved?
- Why Google Should Buy Motorola
- Netflix as a Streaming Service is the Bandwidth King
- Should the Facebook-Microsoft Alliance Worry Google?
Posting Guidelines
We hope the conversations that take place on techpinions.com will be respectful, energetic, constructive, intelligent, and provocative. To make sure we all stay on-topic, all posts will be reviewed by our editors and may be edited for clarity, length, and relevance.
We ask that you adhere to the following guidelines.
1. Our columnists are expressing their opinions. Please respect their opinion and the opinions of other commenters.
2. No selling of products or services. We desire to keep this an ad-free zone. If you use the name of a product or firm as your screenname, your comment may be considered spam and removed.
3.No ad hominem attacks. These are conversations in which we debate ideas. Criticize ideas, not the people behind them. Please by respectful.
4.If you want us to know about outside sources, please link to them, Do not paste them in.
The Tech.pinions columnists


Subscribe to RSS
Pingback: Ways to read the Google-Motorola Mobility deal | Rob Pegoraro
Pingback: Googlerola: What the Web is saying — Tech News and Analysis
Pingback: Why Google had to buy Motorola | TechPinions
Pingback: Googlerola: What the Web is saying | Lanka Weekly
Pingback: Googlerola: What the internet is saying | Modern Techie
Pingback: Googlerola: What the Web is saying - Actualidad