With growing saturation in US and China, India is the next market every smartphone manufacturer wants to have a part of. After China and US, India is the third largest smartphone market in the world.
While India is the third largest market, it has just 10-15% smartphone penetration. So the potential is vast for manufacturers in the years to come. India is well on track to overtake the US as the second largest market and could overtake China as well, given its ever growing young population and falling prices of smartphones.
Less unit share but more value share
Market share in India is dominated by Android followed by Windows Phone with iOS comes a very distant third. In terms of market share iPhones constitute a very small percentage of the Indian smartphone market (<5%). But it must be noted that iPhones still have a greater share of the value of India’s smartphone market. Despite having such meager share, Apple is the second or third most valuable brand in India, surpassed only by Sony and Samsung — the second and first most valuable brands in India, respectively.
Over time, I expect Apple to become the second most valuable brand, given Sony’s falling market share and its fading fortunes. Similarly, I expect Apple to one day overtake Samsung and become the most valuable brand in India as Samsung continues to battle it out with the flood of Chinese manufacturers. The battle with Chinese manufacturers means Samsung can either retain market share by reducing margins to compete or they can hold margins but risk losing share. Either way, Samsung’s profitability is destined to go downwards in the long term.
Lower satisfaction rate for Apple
Apple has a name worldwide to lock users into its ecosystem of devices. As much as 80-85% of iPhones users plan on upgrading to another iPhone when they purchase their next device. This, of course, has been because Apple is one of those very few companies that enable people to make the most out of their devices without really requiring them to be geeks/power users. And the splendid combination of hardware and software gives a pretty awesome user experience. Top this with superb interoperability of the iPhone with MacBooks, iPads, etc. thanks to features such as AirDrop, Continuity and the like and it’s not difficult to see why iPhones are liked by so many and have people coming back to them again and again each time they upgrade.
But it’s important to remember this performance is only achieved with the help of splendid hardware. The latest iPhone 6 and 6 Plus come with some of the best processing power found in smartphones along with accurate displays and some of the sharpest cameras. This cutting edge hardware is what powers the iPhone and makes using it a real delight. I’m not saying software is not important but, if we consider a smartphone as a bird, then hardware and software are its wings. A bird needs the best of both wings to fly to the highest levels.
In most developed countries, many people use the latest iPhones. Although a part of this has to do with the fact users in developed countries have higher spending power, the way carriers have operated in developed markets has also helped Apple a lot.
In most developed countries, carriers often subsidize the cost of a smartphone, although this practice is slowly fading away as US carriers turn to installment plans and Chinese carriers cut subsidies to boost profitability.
The practice of subsidizing smartphones made the latest iPhones available for as low as $200 or so. The subsidy was then recovered from consumers in the form of two-year contracts which forced a person to stay with a carrier and terminating those contracts meant a hefty fine. Also, the general service fee was higher since it even included the cost of the device. This made the carrier look expensive and the average Joe thought the price of the latest iPhone was just $200.
Even though it made a lot of people hate the carriers, the subsidy was a boon for Apple and several high-end Android manufacturers such as Samsung and HTC. It enabled them to sell their high-end smartphones at 1/3rd to 1/4th the price of its unlocked retail value. The remainder was subsidized by the carrier.
However in India, subsidies were never popular since carriers over here operate at razor-thin margins. Smartphones have been bought unlocked for its full retail price and people chose a carrier of their choice and inserted the SIM of that carrier in their smartphone. They are free to swap it anytime they want since there are no contracts.
Along with the lack of subsidies by carriers, general spending capacity of Indians is also far lower. India’s GDP per capita is far lower than something like the US or Japan.
The lack of subsidies and lower GDP per capita made the market for high-end smartphones very dull in India. The share of smartphones costing more than $600 is less than 5% here. This has, in turn, meant very few people can actually buy the latest iPhone in India. In fact, even the predecessor to the latest iPhone is sold at such a high price that very few Indians can afford it.
However, Apple does sell its legacy lineup in India at the price of a mid-range Android smartphone that many Indians can afford to buy. The iPhone 4S 8GB sells for around $220-$230 in India. To be honest, these lower-end iPhones are the ones that end up selling the most in India since this is what Indians can afford.
As with most other countries, Indians have an affinity towards the Apple brand. The iPhone acts as a status symbol in India. Owning any Apple-made product is one of the biggest aspirations for Indians, at least in the tech sector. This aspiration, coupled with the no subsidization and lower GDP per capita, means most people end up buying legacy Apple devices.
The issue is these legacy iPhones come with really outdated hardware. However, most people aren’t savvy enough to understand the role of hardware in the user experience or to properly gauge it. Many in India believe buying any Apple device (even legacy ones) will provide them the same experience.
However, legacy iPhones hardly deliver the kind of performance expected. Apple’s habit of updating the iPhone’s OS frequently is a good thing but, in the case of legacy hardware, it bogs down their performance even more. One of my friends bought an iPhone 4 and, after receiving the first update to iOS 7, the iPhone 4 became nearly useless. Lag was beyond description and the experience was nowhere near satisfactory. My friend swore never to invest in any Apple product ever again.
The same is going to be the case with iPhone 4S and iOS 9. Although iOS 9 is focused on improving performance and the iPhone 4S’ hardware is a giant leap up from the iPhone 4, the experience is still not going to be anywhere near what an iPhone 6 can offer.
These lower-end iPhones like the iPhone 4 and 4S constitute most of the iPhone shipments in India. Given how old these devices are, their experience is often sub-par at best. This leads to a high dissatisfaction rate among Indians for the iPhone. As stated at the beginning, 80-85% of people plan on buying an iPhone the next time they upgrade. Of the remaining 15-20% who don’t plan on buying an iPhone the next time they upgrade, a significant portion of that comes from countries like India.
At the same time, when these dissatisfied iPhone users upgrade, a lot of them give Android a chance and, after using something like the Moto G which also sells for around $200, most of these iPhone users feel Android is so much better than Apple’s iPhone. This dynamic puts Apple’s still costly legacy hardware up against new hardware with higher specs at lower prices from the Android OEM landscape. See this chart on how the best-selling iPhones in India compare to newer low-cost Android smartphones.
Credits to Apple
Despite the numerous challenges Apple faces in India, they are not giving up but doubling down on their Indian operations.
Over the past two years, Apple has launched various commercials to boost the sales of the iPhone. The Cupertino firm has launched EMI plans for users that make buying an iPhone easier. It has launched back-to-school promotions for the Mac. With online purchases for tech products like smartphones becoming normal in India, Apple can move to be less reliant on physical retail channels and gain traction more through e-commerce.
The company has also expanded its distribution partners. Recently, it inked an agreement with BrightStar to distribute iPhones in India and Redington and Ingram Micro have been its distributors in India for quite some time now.
Apple doesn’t have its own stores in India given certain regulatory hurdles but Apple does operate in India through the franchise model. But even its franchise model provides one of the best in-store experiences among smartphone manufacturers. The employees are well trained and know each and every aspect regarding the Apple devices they have on display. Apart from this, service of broken iPhones has always been a delight with Apple. The Cupertino firm always replaces iPhones which are under warranty as long as the cause of the defect is genuine.
Apple has also priced apps on the App Store and songs on iTunes at very reasonable levels. Google has only now taken this approach — for the most part, apps and other content on the Play Store were a direct conversion of their US pricing. However, Apple has always made the pricing of their digital content lower in India than compared to the US.
Conclusion
Apple’s ability to compete and, more importantly, grow in mature markets has been proven by the steady growth in its Mac line. Indeed, the smartphone market is moving in a similar direction. But while even entry level Macs provide a superior user experience when compared to their Windows counterpart, this does not seem to be the case with the iPhone where the entry level models are providing a underwhelming user experience when compared to their Android counterparts. Apple needs to fix this if it is to grow in India. Either Apple needs to discontinue the sale of lower end iPhones or optimize the updates in such a way they work flawlessly on every iPhone which, to be honest, is almost impossible.
One possible solution is for Apple to sell refurbished devices in countries like India. In the US, the shift to leasing plans such as T-Mobile’s Jump on Demand and iPhone Forever program will make people return their iPhones every time they upgrade.
If these returned iPhones are refurbished, packed and sold again by Apple in emerging countries such as India at reduced rates they would sell very well. This will have two possible solutions:
1) Apple would not have to develop a low-cost iPhone for emerging markets and risk possible cannibalization of the high-end.
2) These refurbished iPhones, sold at reduced rates, will not only help Apple boost sales significantly but will help them maintain a good experience for the end users which is very important for Apple’s business model.
For example, now that the iPhone 6S will be launching in September, a lot of people will give their iPhone 6 or other smartphones to friends and family and upgrade. These iPhones can be then sold again in India next year.
Certainly, users would be buying a year old used smartphone. But Apple’s brand image and their excellent replacement policy will give users a lot of confidence.
Thank you very much for this article.
I have three questions, which I think are central to the long-term prospects for Apple in India, and indeed other emerging nations.
1. The local app ecosystem
With only a very small market share and low satisfaction, my expectation would be that local developers would target Android first and maybe iOS never. What do you actually see? Are there a lot of popular apps in India that are locally developed? Do these apps tend to be Android first? Does iOS sometimes lack there popular apps? Do you expect a lack of local apps for iOS to be an issue going forward?
2. Brand perception
You mention that Apple is a very aspirational brand among those in the tech sector, and that they are often willing to purchase outdated products from Apple. However, you also mention that performance on legacy devices tends to be really bad. This seems to be a bit contradictory for me. People in the tech sector should generally be able to discern whether an old iPhone or a new but cheap Android is better, and I expect them to be able to understand that if their old iPhone underperforms, then that is not Apple’s fault, but just because their hardware is old.
In fact, my expectation is that the people buying old iPhones are not tech people, but in fact, people who are status-concious but are not tech-savvy enough to realise that they have to sacrifice performance.
I would appreciate it if you could help me understand the situation better.
3. Differential pricing of apps and music
You mention that Apple has always priced apps and songs at a price that is reasonable for the Indian market. On the other hand, Google has simply done a currency conversion.
My question is, how is this perceived among Indians, and does it have a noticeable effect on the market or brand perception? Is it that for Android users, it doesn’t matter because they side-load content anyway? Is it that for iPhone users, it’s a more critical issue because they cannot side-load without jailbreaking?
More importantly, how is this working for the producers of the content. How are app developers making money from the Indian market and does this pricing help?
Hey there, I’m glad you liked the article. I’ll be answering your points in this comment.
1.As far as the app ecosystem is concerned, ios doesn’t face much of a problem. Most of the globally popular apps are already present on ios. Even locally developed apps in India are made available for ios. Regarding which platform is developed for first, its dependent on the developer. On one hand its quite easier to develop apps for ios when compared to Android. On the other hand Android has a much bigger reach (>90% market share ). There are instances where apps are developed first for ios and there are instances where apps are developed first for Android. However its just a matter of 2-3 months before the app which was earlier Android only comes to ios and the app which was earlier ios only comes to Android. So it doesn’t really matter which app came first where because its just a matter of months or weeks before its available on both ios and Android. Apart from this most people by now know or have a clear idea of the apps they want like Whatsapp, FaceBook, Twitter, Candy Crush, Skype etc and most of these big name apps are already available for both platforms. Apart from this, popular Indian apps like Flipkart, MyAirtel app etc all have also made it to both ios and Android. There are very few apps that are Android only and these apps are most probably made by developers for whom app development is a hobby and not a profession. If someone’s serious about app development then ignoring ios is not possible. I agree its share is very very low but iPhones especially the higher end models such as iPhone 5S and iPhone 6 etc are bought by some of the richest people in India and these are the ones that spend a lot of money on IAP.
2. Regarding the tech sector I guess I was not clear enough. What I meant is that there are certain things almost all of us need to buy. For example a car and a smartphone. I’m a college student right now but when I grow up I would need to buy a car in case Ola and Uber don’t take over. Now when it comes to automobiles I’m a noob. I have no clue as to what horspower is and how to gauge it. How the number of pistons matter etc all. The only thing I know about cars is that Mercedes is well known for its cars. So when I grow I would try to get some model of Mercedes just for its brand even though I’ll be totally clueless as to which model should be bought and how a lower end model differs from a higher end model.
Similalry almost everyone needs to buy electrnoics in todays era. So when someone goes on to buy a smartphone for the first time, they have no clue as to how the number of cores and RAM natter, all they know is that Apple is a well known brand or a brand known for making great smartphone. So they end up buying the lowest priced iPhones just like how I might buy the lowest priced Mercedes.
When I said tech sctor I meant when it comes to buying electronics in general Apple is brand people would preferably want to own.
Yes you’re right that none of the tech savvy people buy old iPhones. Those guys won’t touch something like iPhone 4S with even a 10 foot pole.
3. Regarding differential pricing. It doesn’t really matter much for Android. Credit card penetration in India is significantly low. Just 2-5%, that’s it. Even amongst these 2-5% none of them pay for apps using their credit card in part beacuse initial pricing of apps was so high that most people felt side-loading is better and now that they have got accustomed to side-loading I doubt if they’ll ever want to pay again given apps can be got for free via side loading.
iOS on the other hand doesn’t allow side loading and pricing content in par with the purchasing power of Indians might trigger a lot of us to pay for apps if not other forms of content such as music and video. For example if an app is priced for 10-15 RS in App Store I’ll be more than willing to pay for it.
Hey there, I’m glad you liked the article. I’ll be answering your points in this comment.
1.As far as the app ecosystem is concerned, ios doesn’t face much of a problem. Most of the globally popular apps are already present on ios. Even locally developed apps in India are made available for ios. Regarding which platform is developed for first, its dependent on the developer. On one hand its quite easier to develop apps for ios when compared to Android. On the other hand Android has a much bigger reach (>90% market share ). There are instances where apps are developed first for ios and there are instances where apps are developed first for Android. However its just a matter of 2-3 months before the app which was earlier Android only comes to ios and the app which was earlier ios only comes to Android. So it doesn’t really matter which app came first where because its just a matter of months or weeks before its available on both ios and Android. Apart from this most people by now know or have a clear idea of the apps they want like Whatsapp, FaceBook, Twitter, Candy Crush, Skype etc and most of these big name apps are already available for both platforms. Apart from this, popular Indian apps like Flipkart, MyAirtel app etc all have also made it to both ios and Android. There are very few apps that are Android only and these apps are most probably made by developers for whom app development is a hobby and not a profession. If someone’s serious about app development then ignoring ios is not possible. I agree its share is very very low but iPhones especially the higher end models such as iPhone 5S and iPhone 6 etc are bought by some of the richest people in India and these are the ones that spend a lot of money on IAP.
2. Regarding the tech sector I guess I was not clear enough. What I meant is that there are certain things almost all of us need to buy. For example a car and a smartphone. I’m a college student right now but when I grow up I would need to buy a car in case Ola and Uber don’t take over. Now when it comes to automobiles I’m a noob. I have no clue as to what horspower is and how to gauge it. How the number of pistons matter etc all. The only thing I know about cars is that Mercedes is well known for its cars. So when I grow I would try to get some model of Mercedes just for its brand even though I’ll be totally clueless as to which model should be bought and how a lower end model differs from a higher end model.
Similalry almost everyone needs to buy electrnoics in todays era. So when someone goes on to buy a smartphone for the first time, they have no clue as to how the number of cores and RAM natter, all they know is that Apple is a well known brand or a brand known for making great smartphone. So they end up buying the lowest priced iPhones just like how I might buy the lowest priced Mercedes.
When I said tech sctor I meant when it comes to buying electronics in general Apple is brand people would preferably want to own.
Yes you’re right that none of the tech savvy people buy old iPhones. Those guys won’t touch something like iPhone 4S with even a 10 foot pole.
3. Regarding differential pricing. It doesn’t really matter much for Android. Credit card penetration in India is significantly low. Just 2-5%, that’s it. Even amongst these 2-5% none of them pay for apps using their credit card in part beacuse initial pricing of apps was so high that most people felt side-loading is better and now that they have got accustomed to side-loading I doubt if they’ll ever want to pay again given apps can be got for free via side loading.
iOS on the other hand doesn’t allow side loading and pricing content in par with the purchasing power of Indians might trigger a lot of us to pay for apps if not other forms of content such as music and video. For example if an app is priced for 10-15 RS in App Store I’ll be more than willing to pay for it.
Thank you for your detailed reply. It makes a lot of sense and clears up my thinking on this issue.
There’s a lot to think about…
Some really excellent info, I look forward to the continuation.