ARM-ing the Enterprise

Jack Gold / April 18th, 2014

The ARM ecosystem is the king of mobility, with the vast majority of smartphones and most tablets being powered by ARM based devices. While enterprises are often adopting ARM powered devices through BYOD, vendors creating solutions to meet enterprise challenges are increasingly broadening the scope and breadth of products. Certainly the x86 ecosystem is not dead, nor will it simply disappear. Its leading proponent, Intel, is fighting back strongly with next generation Atom chips and software optimizations. But while mobility is leading the charge in expanding ARM’s influence in the enterprise, the “Enterprise of Things” (EoT) and the approaching implementation of personal clouds and distributed/local area clouds will have great impact over what gets deployed in the next 2-3 years.

Where is the market going?
Over the next 2-3 years we will see a significant volume market develop for microservers for distributed cloud apps, including both remote office and IT delivered enterprise solutions. BYOS (bring your own server) solutions will follow in the path of BYOD and users will increasingly employ microservers as consolidation points and small processing stations for their expanding mix of devices (we expect users to have 5-6 regularly used devices within 1-2 years). Smartphones often serve this requirement today, but will not be adequate for the longer term needs of more complex devices. Not every device will have a direct connection to the cloud, as this is bandwidth and data inefficient, yet the volume of devices/connections present acute challenges to enterprise security requirements of VPNs, identity, data integrity, etc. Devices will often connect to personal area cloud servers for staging to broader cloud based services, as well as utilizing localized pre-processing, analytics and data consolidation. While the primary function of these microservers will be I/O intensive, increasingly strong CPU/GPU requirements will come into play for software and application enablement.

Where will the ARM ecosystem find success in emerging enterprise deployments?
We expect many of these micro server and distributed cloud products to be powered by ARM chips, although there will be a significant amount of low powered x86 based solutions as well, particularly in those situations where software availability/compatibility is key. Further, we expect the majority of enterprise-class tablets to be running Android within the next 1-2 years, and most will be powered by an ARM based chip. Windows based tablets, and especially those powered by x86 chips, will remain a minority, with 20-30% of the enterprise market in 3 years. Finally, the majority of emerging “things” will be ARM powered, and enterprise focused “things” will be designed and deployed for special use cases.

However, there will also be some areas ARM will have great difficulty penetrating. One primary area is notebook-like enterprise devices. We don’t expect clamshell, cloud-only, Chromebook-like devices to be widely popular among enterprise users primarily because not everything will be done in the cloud, and because on-board Microsoft Office will continue to dominate the knowledge worker’s workstation needs. Despite some preliminary inroads from Google and others trying to change this behavior, we don’t expect it to get beyond a small minority of users (5%-10%).

Which ARM vendors are key to the enterprise?
There currently is a large ecosystem and many suppliers for ARM technology. But the vast majority is focused on the consumer space. Who is well positioned to carry the ARM banner into the enterprise and lead in supplying enterprise-class chips? The current leader in smartphone and tablet chips, Qualcomm, doesn’t seem to be interested in providing more server-centric solutions, at least not at this phase of the market. Leadership (and market enablement) would take a company with expertise in enterprise-level solutions. We believe AMD is in good position to go after the enterprise market, now that they have established their “ambidextrous” philosophy (e.g., produce products nearly equivalent with either x86 or ARM cores to meet the needs of its customers). A focus on enhanced CPU and GPU functionality, an area AMD knows well, will be critical to the enterprise marketplace. With primary relationships already established with enterprise device and server vendors like Dell, HP and Lenovo, who would in any case lead the charge in enterprise deployments, they stand to gain from the expansion of ARM-based solutions tailored for the unique requirements of the enterprise (e.g., computational enhancements, security, manageability, ease of deployment). This is a market where AMD could show leadership and competitive differentiation, while avoiding low margin commodity supplier status for at least for the next 3-4 years.

Is x86 dead?
Despite the expected expansion of ARM into the enterprise, x86 is not dead by any means. Low power x86 is still attractive in many markets and product areas (e.g., notebooks, Windows tablets and higher end Android tabs, medium to larger servers). Further, microservers based on x86 architecture are making their way into the market. Intel for one is fighting ARM’s incursions by placing increased emphasis on addressing this market with new targeted products expected over the next 1-2 years. But x86 will increasingly be sharing the enterprise IT space with ARM over the next 2-3 years as ARM’s expanding ecosystem invades the traditionally exclusive x86 space.

Conclusions: The next 2-3 years will see a large number of enterprise targeted devices in the client and microserver space powered by ARM chips. Chip vendors that best understand and engineer products for enterprise needs will see strong growth and AMD could be one of the leaders in this area. The change from a mostly x86/Windows marketplace to a more diverse ecosystem will see enterprises going through many of the pains and challenges they have already faced with BYOD. The transition requires enterprises start to plan now for the groundswell coming in the next 2-3 years and to build the required strategies and expertise needed to meet the challenges.

Jack Gold

Jack E. Gold is Founder and President at J.Gold Associates, LLC, a technology industry analyst firm. Mr. Gold has over 40 years in the computer and electronics industries, including work in imaging, multimedia, technical computing, consumer electronics, software development and manufacturing systems. He is a leading authority on mobile, wireless and pervasive computing, advising clients on business analysis, strategic marketing and planning, architecture, product evaluation/selection and enterprise application strategies. Mr. Gold is widely quoted in the press, and has presented at numerous conferences and industry events. Before founding J. Gold Associates, he spent 12 years with META Group as a Vice President in Technology Research Services. He also held positions in technical and marketing management at Digital Equipment Corp. and Xerox. Mr. Gold has a BS in Electrical Engineering from Rochester Institute of Technology and an MBA from Clark University. His thoughts and opinions are his own.
  • krabbie

    It must be genuinely easy for you to dismiss all of the byod iApple devices that are already IN enterprise, and you claim that in two years, two years!!!! Android will be the major player in enterprise. I don’t get it, or you are just a anti Apple writer that only sees what their world view is. To quote someone smarter than me… Face reality as it is, not as it was or as you wish it to be. ~ Jack Welch
    So, where are the Enterprise Apps for android??? crickets
    where is the security for Enterprise from the androidian arena???
    I think your article would have been much better stating the avenue of androidian success rather than making the kind of predictions that your espouse. The HOW is missing here.

  • Bruno Deserto

    Interesting article but I wonder where Apple is in the whole thing. I understand Android is everywhere as companies are making low profits, almost zero and giving low cost Android phones away. But when it comes to class tablets and phones few companies can really face Apple. Much has been said about Apple prodcts’ prices. It Samsung is charging almost the same for their phones. If there is one company that can really challenge Apple right now is Google with their pure android thing, maybe Amazon in a few years because Samsung ships junk after junk. I hate touchwiz and I don’t think I am alone here. I am very very pleased with my iPad Air it is truly fantastic for me. I don’t want to make my opinion better than anyone else’s is if Samsjng is fine for you just enjoy it.

  • pk_de_cville

    You could have spent some ink considering the impact of Apple’s ARM 64bit A7 and A8 chips. Perhaps Apple’s fitness/health HealthBook app/cloud might impact the medical establishment. Last I looked, it’s fairly large.

    Aren’t you ignoring Apple? “Apple” doesn’t appear once in your article.

    Interesting, it’s currently dominant with predictable innovation expected shortly; probably leading to continued dominance.

    If you’re implicitly arguing Apple will fade away, then you could strengthen your analysis with some Apple targeted critique.

  • Nathan Brookwood

    Hey Jack, what the heck is an “Enterprise of Things (EoT)”? We already have “Internet of Things” (IoT) and “Internet of Everything” (IoE). Why do we have to mash up these two concepts to produce yet another confusing TLA?

  • Herding_sheep

    Android was supposed to have been the “dominant enterprise platform in 1-2 years”…..for the past 4 years. And thanks for the “Enterprise of Things,” yet another made up catch phrase which makes absolutely no sense and has no actual meaning. What an insightful article.

Protected by Gerben Law