Many of us covet that classic love story: meet unexpectedly, fall madly in love, age gracefully together.
But the average age of marriage is creeping up. And the when, where and how we’re meeting our spouse-to-be is changing too, driven by the digital age we’ve been thrown into.
Today’s dating environment is more diffuse and more competitive than ever, as dating apps compete for our attention and affection, all the while gathering and analyzing our information. It is fundamentally redefining the dating norms we’ve known for the past half century. But is the data driving us to make the right romantic decisions?
Digitizing the matchmaking process makes us more reliant on data than ever. Before Match.com launched in 1995, chemistry — with an assist from serendipity — was the primary driver of matchmaking throughout most of modern Western culture.
The first generation of dating apps put the onus of finding a match squarely on the user: scroll through pages of profiles, scanning photos and examining other sundry details. Today’s dating apps rely on GPS, algorithms and, increasingly, how you use the service to define compatibility, make a match and motivate a first date.
Tinder, one of the most well-known and heavily used dating apps today, has 50 million users in 196 countries and produces 26 million “matches” a day. In November, Tinder released a new algorithm that incorporates both technical and informational data points.
Digital dating platforms provide the illusion of having unlimited choice, challenging traditional dating norms. Today’s dating app users are accustomed to having multiple, simultaneous digital conversations. This dating behavior would be nearly impossible to do in public but is incredibly common in spaces enabled by digital communications.
Perhaps as a way to fight the illusion of unlimited choice and capitalize on dating data, some dating apps like Hinge and Coffee Meets Bagel are limiting the number of recommended matches they provide.
Today, about five percent of Americans in a marriage or committed relationship met online and 15 percent of Americans have used online dating sites or mobile dating apps. And the rapid rate of growth in digital dating suggests this figure is poised to increase. However, like love itself, digital dating isn’t all rainbows and butterflies.
Roughly one-third of online dating service users have never actually gone on a date with someone they’ve met online. Many users seem to be only marginally connected and committed, making it harder to find the signal through the noise.
It is much easier to like someone in the digital universe of matchmatching because it is equally easy to stop liking them. Online dating cycles are much shorter than analog courtships. In almost all instances, you simply click “unmatch” and you can be disconnected from them entirely because the social norms that exist in the physical world do not apply.
First impressions have been replaced by digital images, which have become incredibly important elements of the digitization and redefining of dating norms, thanks in large part to the proliferation of, and the ease of use of, smartphones with cameras, filters and photo editing software.
Dating apps allow you to share multiple photos with would-be matches. Like a peacock spreading its feathers to attract a mate, we do the same with a collage of photos. But in the digital realm, it’s subtly different: We get to choose (and digitally enhance) the feathers we portray. We pull from a million photos until we have the perfect array and then use these photos as a sort of dating “resume”.
In almost all instances, these types of photos tell us a lot more about what the person is looking for in a match than about themselves. Before we’ve even said hello, we know more than any opening conversation could have provided historically.
The full ramifications of the new digitally defined era of dating are still coming to fruition.
Some studies suggest couples who meet online are three times more likely to divorce. Only time will tell if statistics like these hold as the popularity of the medium grows.
While there have always been unspoken dating norms, they are being defined (and often redefined) by smartphone apps and internet sites. Because the rules are fixed within the parameters of the software, what were once loosely understood norms are becoming strictly enforced parameters.
In a highly competitive environment, apps are finding new rules to implement in order to differentiate themselves and, consequently, are redefining dating norms as a result.
Digitization continues to bring us numerous new markets, and in the process redefine some, like matchmaking, that are as old as time.
“Before Match.com launched in 1995, chemistry — with an assist from serendipity — was the primary driver of matchmaking”
Nice elision from offline IRL meetings to for-profit dating sites. As if those are the only two options in the entire universe of meeting other people.
I have a clue for you: there’s these things called online forums, chat rooms, usenet, mailing lists. Where you can go and meet other people who share some of your interests. And in the course of meeting those people and getting to know them, who knows, you might discover that one of them is someone you really really like, and then you arrange to meet them IRL and then who knows what might happen.
Every discussion of online dating sites I’ve ever read suggests that, like singles bars before them, they’re good for casual hookups and awful for everything else, the last resort of the desperately lonely.
“Some studies suggest couples who meet online are three times more likely to divorce.”
If you’re doing it wrong, maybe. My spouse and I met on usenet, bonded over email, and will have been together, one way or another, for 19 years this fall. In my experience, meeting online creates stronger bonds because you’re getting to know the person first, then later, after the friendship is forged, you attach a face and body (and who knows, the possibility of romance) to that person. But I’ve never used a dating site, so what do I know.
I’m still a believer in kismet now matter how it is propagated!
Joe
It seems everyone around me who’s single is on dating sites. What’s surprising is that they’re on there a lot for the fantasy, a bit for non-sexual companionship, and not that much at all for sex.
Which reminds me, I’m getting old, too :-p
I think I disagree with you, Dr. Dubravac, on one point, and that love IS all about “rainbows and butterflies”.
South sydney News myGC
actual it, think it’s great! MyGC is an internet based go to for the Gold Coast. by means of our radio station 1029 Hot Tomato, We are in the middle of the GC community. While Hot Tomato is what you chnlove review watch on the Coast, MyGC brings the Coast to life with ending news, Traffic and weather updates when you have to them, sports, nights, training, portraits, pastime news and lifestyle content. We’re about the approach to life we love here, And the folks who live it.
MyGC is the official Hot Tomato website and you’ll find all things Hot Tomato on myGC from live streaming and show info, To events and competitive events.
Contact UsSite Terms ConditionsQueensland News new south wales News Australian Capital Territory News Victoria News South Australia News Western Australia News Northern Territory News Tasmania News
World Sport celebration Viral Gold Coast Weather Traffic Live! Good Morning Gold Coast Partner Content become a member of the loop!
The trap! organize
Submit NewsAsk a Family Lawyer myGC Blogs give away to myGCHot Tomato Partner Directory Advertise With UsSubmit an Event
At the films Ghostbusters: Afterlife At The Movies Uncharted 2022 The Star Gold Coast Magic Millions Carnival Koala Breeding Season Galey to the rescue: The Walk for designer watches Gold Coast Beaches Gold Coast Crime and Public Safety
Gold Coast Crime Statistics Gold Coast Crime Map Crimestoppers Safety Camera Network neighbourhood Watch.