Intel’s Virtual Reality Bet: Just in Time, or Far Too Late?

During Intel’s recent Developer Forum in August, the company announced it is working on a new “merged reality” platform called Alloy. The device, a standalone head-mounted display (HMD), is a reference design Intel will provide to hardware partners who will use it to create shipping products. Alloy will run Microsoft’s upcoming Windows Holographic platform. Microsoft and Intel executives said they plan to make both the reference design and the software available to partners by the second half of 2017. I’m pleased to see Intel entering this space but frankly, that timeframe seems a tech lifetime away, especially with the news this week that Qualcomm’s competing standalone platform will be ready later this year.

I’m also not thrilled that, in its zeal to coin a phrase it can own, Intel opted to call Alloy “merged reality” instead of simply virtual reality (VR). Company executives argue that, because Alloy can use its front-facing Intel RealSense camera to bring in elements of a user’s surroundings, they’ve created a different technology but, in time, all VR will do this. Just as Microsoft insists HoloLens is “mixed reality”, and not—as I would argue—an advanced form of augmented reality (AR), these companies risk adding significant confusion to this already often-perplexing market. Even on stage during the keynote the speakers kept using augmented, virtual, mixed, and merged interchangeably, when, at least for the near term, augmented and virtual reality are two different things.

Naming conventions aside, the introduction of Alloy makes sense from a strategic perspective and the prototype hardware showed real potential. As Intel increasingly works to move away from its dependence on the PC market, it must explore new opportunities such as VR. Reference designs are how Intel helped shaped the PC market in the past, using its R&D to drive new designs into the market. So far, those same PC vendors haven’t entered the HMD space, choosing instead to focus on making desktops and notebooks (and even backpacks) that can power existing tethered VR HMDs such as the HTC Vive and Oculus Rift. I expect some of these vendors to bring Alloy-based products to market, eventually.

Increasingly Competitive Market
There are three basic types of VR hardware in addition to the rudimentary Google Cardboard. The first type is screen-less viewers such as Samsung’s Oculus-based Gear VR, which work in conjunction with specific smartphones. Second is tethered HMDs such as the shipping Vive and Rift which connect to a PC and the upcoming Sony Gear VR which connects to the PlayStation 4. Finally, there are future standalone products such as Alloy with everything integrated, including cameras, processors, sensors, screens, and batteries. Each type of hardware has its strengths and weaknesses: The phone-based viwers are the least expensive, but currently offer relatively limited performance. Tethered HMDs offer the best VR performance by far, but are pricey and constrained by their tethered nature. In theory, standalone products could offer the best compromise between the two extremes, with improved VR performance over screen-less viewers and lower prices and better mobility than tethered HMDs.

Back in March, major ARM chip designer Qualcomm announced both a VR Software Development Kit (SDK) and plans to work with ODM GoerTek in China to create its own standalone HMD reference design. On September 1, at the IFA show in Berlin, Qualcomm officially announced the Snapdragon VR820 reference design based on its Snapdragon 820 processor. The company expects to make the VR820 available to partners in the fourth quarter of this year, with partner products shipping shortly after that. I’ve not seen the current reference design in person, but I did test an early prototype that seemed promising. I also commend the company for calling the VR820 what it is: Virtual Reality. The bottom line: Qualcomm’s platform is likely to enjoy as much as a one year head start in the market over the Intel-based platform

In addition to the Qualcomm-based products, Intel will face another major challenger: Google’s DayDream. Google announced DayDream, its VR platform within Android for use with screen-less viewers, at Google I/O and I’ve covered it in more depth in a previous column. Later this year, we’ll start to see a range of new Android smartphones shipping with hardware and software support for DayDream. In addition to the platform itself, Google also announced its own screen-less viewer hardware reference design for use with DayDream, as well as a handheld controller. The first DayDream-enabled smartphones will ship later this year and the volumes will ramp fairly quickly. It’s tough to predict what sort of attach rate the phones+viewers will enjoy, as we haven’t seen actual products or pricing. But even a relatively small attach rate percentage should quickly drive DayDream to become the volume VR platform in terms of an installed base (Google Cardboard notwithstanding). In my conversations with virtual-reality content producers, one thing is clear: Many feel DayDream marks the true beginning of VR’s move to the consumer mainstream.

The Challenge for Alloy
So where does this competitive landscape leave Intel and its partners, with actual products not likely to ship until late 2017 or early 2018? Even if the Intel product proves a solid performer, it’s going be a difficult road. People that want the highest-quality VR experiences will continue to spend top dollar ($399-$799) to buy the latest version of the high-end tethered HMDs, despite the clear usability issues associated with being connected to stationary computer. Consumers with an investment in recent-vintage DayDream-enabled Android smartphones who want a better-than-Cardboard experience without breaking the bank will need to invest another $100-$150 for a viewer and controller. And, in the presumed mid-range ($200-$500?), Qualcomm-based standalone products will have been shipping into the market for up to a year.

Acknowledging that plenty can change in the next 12 months, the best option for Intel and its partners may well be to focus Alloy efforts on vertical markets. My expectation is many companies in the next 12 months will begin to experiment with consumer-grade VR products for business uses, yielding mixed results. A commercial grade Intel X86-based standalone product running Windows may well prove to be the product companies are looking for in 2018.

One thing I’d like to see from Intel at IDF next year: A top-shelf reference design for an augmented reality HMD. While VR clearly represents a sizeable opportunity for Intel and the broader market, AR has the potential to be truly world-changing. If Intel wants to be a major player in that market, it’s going to have to move faster.

Published by

Tom Mainelli

Tom Mainelli has covered the technology industry since 1995. He manages IDC's Devices and Displays group, which covers a broad range of hardware categories including PCs, tablets, smartphones, thin clients, displays, and wearables. He works closely with tech companies, industry contacts, and other analysts to provide in-depth insight and analysis on the always-evolving market of endpoint devices and their related services. In addition to overseeing the collection of historical shipment data and the forecasting of shipment trends in cooperation with IDC's Tracker organization, he also heads up numerous primary research initiatives at IDC. Chief among them is the fielding and analysis of IDC's influential, multi-country Consumer and Commercial PC, Tablet, and Smartphone Buyer Surveys. Mainelli is also driving new research at IDC around the technologies of augmented and virtual reality.

46 thoughts on “Intel’s Virtual Reality Bet: Just in Time, or Far Too Late?”

  1. Even more than whether it’s early or late, I’m wondering if Intel will manage to make something that’s relevant, competitive. Outside of x86 CPUs, were they started with a huge advantage, have they ever achieved that ? Their GPUs still aren’t even very good.
    Will MS’s VR software be x86-dependent, or WinRT-based ?

  2. I’m really inspired with your writing skills and also with the format in your
    weblog. Is that this a paid theme or did you customize it
    yourself? Either way stay up the nice high quality writing, it’s
    uncommon to peer a nice weblog like this
    one these days..

  3. I’m not sure exactly why but this website is loading
    incredibly slow for me. Is anyone else having this problem or is it
    a issue on my end? I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.

  4. I’m curious to find out what blog system you happen to
    be utilizing? I’m having some small security
    issues with my latest website and I would like to find something more safe.
    Do you have any suggestions?

  5. Hi! I could have sworn I’ve been to this web site before but after
    looking at many of the posts I realized it’s new to me.
    Regardless, I’m certainly delighted I came across it and I’ll be bookmarking it and checking back often!

  6. Hey there! Quick question that’s entirely off topic.
    Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My web site looks weird when viewing from my iphone.
    I’m trying to find a template or plugin that might be
    able to fix this issue. If you have any suggestions, please share.
    Thanks!

  7. Hey! I know this is somewhat off topic but I was wondering if you knew where I could get a captcha plugin for my comment form?
    I’m using the same blog platform as yours and I’m having
    difficulty finding one? Thanks a lot!

  8. I was suggested this blog by my cousin. I’m not sure whether this post is written by him as no one else know such detailed about my problem.
    You’re incredible! Thanks!

  9. Wonderful article! This is the type of information that are supposed to be shared across the
    net. Shame on Google for not positioning this post higher!
    Come on over and seek advice from my web site . Thank you =)

  10. Your style is so unique in comparison to other folks I have read stuff from.

    Many thanks for posting when you’ve got the opportunity, Guess I will just book mark this page.

  11. naturally like your web site however you have to test
    the spelling on several of your posts. Several of
    them are rife with spelling problems and I find it very troublesome to inform the
    reality on the other hand I’ll certainly come again again.

  12. Wonderful beat ! I would like to apprentice at the same time
    as you amend your site, how could i subscribe for a blog website?

    The account aided me a appropriate deal. I have been tiny
    bit acquainted of this your broadcast provided vibrant transparent idea

  13. Howdy would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re using?
    I’m going to start my own blog in the near future but I’m having a hard time choosing between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your design seems
    different then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique.

    P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  14. I’m not sure exactly why but this web site is loading very
    slow for me. Is anyone else having this problem or is it a issue on my
    end? I’ll check back later on and see if the problem still exists.

  15. We are a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community.
    Your site provided us with useful information to work on. You have done an impressive task and our whole neighborhood will
    likely be thankful to you.

  16. Thank you, I have just been looking for info about this topic for a long time and
    yours is the best I have found out so far.
    However, what about the conclusion? Are you sure in regards to the supply?

  17. Magnificent beat ! I would like to apprentice while you amend
    your web site, how can i subscribe for a blog web site?
    The account helped me a acceptable deal. I had been tiny bit
    acquainted of this your broadcast provided bright
    clear idea

  18. Hello my friend! I want to say that this post is amazing, nice written and include almost all significant infos.

    I’d like to look extra posts like this .

  19. Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason seemed to be on the web the
    easiest thing to be aware of. I say to you, I certainly get
    annoyed while people think about worries that they plainly don’t know about.
    You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side-effects , people can take a signal.
    Will likely be back to get more. Thanks

  20. Greetings! Very useful advice in this particular article!

    It’s the little changes that produce the most important changes.
    Thanks a lot for sharing!

  21. My brother recommended I may like this blog. He used to be totally
    right. This submit truly made my day. You can not imagine just how a lot time I
    had spent for this info! Thanks!

  22. Thanks for one’s marvelous posting! I certainly enjoyed reading it, you’re
    a great author.I will always bookmark your blog and will
    come back later on. I want to encourage yourself to continue your great work,
    have a nice afternoon!

  23. Howdy are using WordPress for your site platform? I’m new to the blog
    world but I’m trying to get started and create my own. Do you need any coding knowledge to make your own blog?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  24. Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I’ve truly enjoyed browsing your blog posts.
    After all I’ll be subscribing to your rss feed and I hope you write again very soon!

  25. I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good.
    I don’t know who you are but certainly you are going to a famous blogger if
    you aren’t already 😉 Cheers!

  26. I’m not sure why but this weblog is loading extremely slow for me.

    Is anyone else having this problem or is it a problem on my end?
    I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *