Tech Dirt t-shirt

It’s Time To Fix DMCA Takedowns

Tech Dirt t-shirt
T-shirt at the Techdirt Insider Shop

A few days ago, a teacher posted a copyright Pearson Education personality inventory on a blog at Edublogs.org. Pearson served a Digital Millennium Copyright Act notice, which set off a series of events that led to nearly 1.5 million student and teacher blogs going temporarily dark after Edublogs’ hosting service took its servers offline. (You can read the details of the affair in this Techdirt account. By Oct. 16, Edublogs was back up, apparently with a new hosting service.)

My purpose isn’t to defend or attack Pearson–plenty of others have done that–or even to rail against DMCA, which is full of both useful and ridiculous provisions. But its clear that a section of the law that was created to protect web sites hosting third-party content has gone off the rails.

DMCA requires site operators to take down copyright-infringing material at the request of the copyright holder. The key language, known as Section 512 or the safe harbor provision, is part of a compromise that bars infringement claims against sites such as YouTube as long as they make good-faith efforts to keep infringing content out and comply with takedown notices. It was this provision that allowed YouTube to fend off a suit by Viacom (still wending its way through appeals) charging massive copyright infringement. Without it, the whole idea of user-generated web content would long ago have collapsed under an assault of copyright suits.

But there are problems with the whole DMCA takedown process and they are getting worse. To ensure safe harbor protection, many sites have turned to algorithms that hunt for infringing content and these programs make mistakes, lots of them. For example, YouTube blocked posts of Michele Obama’s speech to the Democratic National convention because the address had been carried in copyrighted network broadcasts.

Content owners also use algorithms to hunt for infringement, and these too have caused trouble. Earlier this month, a Microsoft infringement-hunter went a bit crazy and sent Google 440,000 takedown requests, including pages posted by Wikipedia, the BBC, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Aggressive copyright enforcement backed by takedown requests has targeted political advertising.  Some of this is legitimate, if perhaps unwise;  copyright holders have the right to disapprove the use of their material in ads.  But much, including network objections to the use of news clips and BMG’s attempt to block airing of ads featuring President Obama singing an Al Green song, stomp on the fair use exemption built into copyright law. (The Center for Democracy & Technology has a good analysis of the problem. It was written during the 2010 election season, but applies as well to this year.)

On the whole, the Section 512 and the DMCA takedown process has worked reasonably well at balancing interests, but there is evidence that the playing field is starting to tilt toward rights holders. I think some relatively  modest reforms are needed to restore balance (even though I am always reluctant to propose any copyright law changes on the principle  that the law almost always emerges from Congress in worse shape than it went in.)

First, we need a way to minimize collateral damage. Takedowns should be limited to to pages containing infringing material and the practice of taking down whole sites because of a small amount of potential infringement must stop. In the case of Edublogs, the takedown came after the site operator, wpmu.org, had blocked the offending post but had accidentally left a copy in a server cache. The  hosting service just did the quickest and simplest thing and pulled down the whole site.

Second, the practice of making sweeping takedown requests at the least hint of infringement needs to be reined in by penalizing false or overbroad claims. Section 512(f) of DMCA makes it possible to recover damages for a takedown that “knowingly materially misrepresents” a claim. But the law sets a very high bar for such recovery and it simply is not a viable alternative for a blogger, or anyone much smaller than YouTube, to bring a damages case against, say, Warner Bros. We need a more effective way to discourage over broad takedown requests and to compensate victims of false claims.

Copyright law, and intellectual property law in general, is all about striking a balance, weighing the rights of content producers against those of users and consumers. In recent years, the debate has been dominated by copyright maximalists, who want to restrict fair use into oblivion, and minimalists, who believe copyright is evil in principle or who think that fair use is whatever use they wish to make. Both are wrong, and they stand in the way of reasonable solutions.

 

 

 

 

Published by

Steve Wildstrom

Steve Wildstrom is veteran technology reporter, writer, and analyst based in the Washington, D.C. area. He created and wrote BusinessWeek’s Technology & You column for 15 years. Since leaving BusinessWeek in the fall of 2009, he has written his own blog, Wildstrom on Tech and has contributed to corporate blogs, including those of Cisco and AMD and also consults for major technology companies.

856 thoughts on “It’s Time To Fix DMCA Takedowns”

  1. In the last 10 years I’ve repeatedly seen copyright legislation that in my view goes way too far in the direction of restricting the use of content. I’m pretty convinced that copyright legislation is driven by *lobbyists* who represent the content producers. These lobbyists are undoubtedly very well paid and therefore have excessive clout in the legislature. The result is that the interests of the public get run into the ground.

    The best way we could influence the legislation would be to hit the producers where it hurts: by not buying their content. That would be highly effective and would get us reasonable and fair laws. But it’s too much to hope for.

  2. Your t-shirt example reminds me of the Copyleft t-shirt that had the algorithm for decrypting DVDs printed on it. The t-shirt was taken down on a DMCA order.

  3. Hello would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re working with? I’m going to start my own blog soon but I’m having a difficult time choosing between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal. The reason I ask is because your design and style seems different then most blogs and I’m looking for something unique. P.S Apologies for getting off-topic but I had to ask!

  4. An average rating of 4.6 out of 5 on the App Store from over 6,600 ratings, OLBG’s Sports Betting Tips app is one of the favorites tips apps for bettors. They have thousands of experts across all the major sports and prioritise showing app users the most popular tips and most profitable tipsters. 1win is a relatively new bookmaker which has earned a good reputation. Punters will find a huge selection of games, generous welcome bonuses, and promotions. 1win also holds a Curacao license making them a legit online betting site. Also, go into the events and read our football tipsters thoughts on the game. These are reasoning for backing up their tips and can be very helpful. We are here to help you out with any sports betting You can follow our website Join Telegram or directly Whatsapp us to get more updates as per your requirements. From the year 2010, we started giving predictions we are all experts on cricket prediction. We will try our best expert efforts to provide you with the best prediction and at least recover your lost money slowly. Welcome to ExpertFreePrediction. The No. 1 Best Prediction Website in the World.
    https://www.credly.com/users/tommy-boyce
    We do our best to keep the content up to date, but always check the offer’s details on the respective sites. You can email the site owner to let them know you were blocked. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. Once you visit the official site of 1win, you can find the 1win registration button on the top right part of the 1win homepage. The registration button is highlighted in green. You need to click on the placed registration button to start the 1win sign-up process; If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER for crisis counseling and referral services. Select your state of residence to view additional state-specific terms and resources. Registration is a prerequisite for access to the service of 1Win and the full range of functions and features. All steps are quick and literally in a few clicks, even a new user will be able to determine the steps of the procedure. Below is a step-by-step instruction for registering an account at 1Win:

Leave a Reply to Rich Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *