Just A Toy

As part of my Photo 365 project, in which I take a photo every day of the year, I snapped this the other day:

I won’t mention the expletive I used in the photo’s caption, but suffice it to say that seeing this ad immediately struck a nerve with me. The snarky “just a toy” line is, of course, an allusion to the iPad. The insinuation being that a Surface is more capable of doing “real work” than an iPad, presumably because a Surface can run full versions of Windows and Office.

Honestly, what a crock.

Besides being pejorative, Microsoft’s “just a toy” sentiment strikes me as woefully out of touch. The iPad is fast approaching its fourth birthday — have we not by now seen what the iPad is about? Customers sure seem to, judging by iPad’s holiday sales numbers. Moreover, these kinds of ads reek of desparation — Microsoft is so in need of some semblance of traction in the tablet market that it continues to perpetuate the old and tired “consumption versus creation” cliche. As Ben Bajarin tweeted, Microsoft just doesn’t get it.

On a personal level, though, Microsoft’s “just a toy” jab offends me for two reasons.

First, as I’ve written previously, the iPad has become so good at productivity that I gave my old 11-inch MacBook Air — which I originally bought with the intent of using it as a writing machine — to my sister. As a writer, the iPad is fully capable of helping me get my work done. As I mostly work with Markdown files stored in Dropbox and iCloud, Editorial has become my go-to text editor, while Poster helps me post to my blog from the iPad. If I want or need to make HTML and/or CSS changes to my site, I can use Panic’s Diet Coda. In a broader sense, iOS’s one-app-at-a-time concept is refreshing, allowing me to better focus at whatever task is at hand, and it’s satisfying to me knowing that iOS is capable of real work. All of this to say that the iPad is, for all intents and purposes, my “laptop”. It is my mobile computer — I carry it with me everywhere I go — and I don’t forsee myself going back to a traditional Mac laptop.

Secondly, I find the iPad Air to be the best iPad I’ve ever used from an accessibility perspective. Before upgrading to my Air a couple of months ago, I used an iPad 3 for about 18 months. It was a great device, to be sure, but I grew weary of the thicker, heavier body and the way the A5X chip would make the iPad uncomfortably warm after extended periods of use. Thus, upgrading to the iPad Air was not only a huge step in terms of internals — the 64-bit A7 being the prime reason — but, more importantly, the dramatically thinner and lighter chassis makes the Air much easier for me to hold for longer times. As I have cerebral palsy, my condition is such that I suffer from reduced strength in my arms and hands. What this means is that it’s more difficult for me to comfortably hold objects, especially for extended periods. The iPad Air, then, is so thin and so light compared to my iPad 3 that I can comfortably hold it for reading in Instapaper or The New York Times without worrying so much about fatigue setting in. Being able to use the iPad longer means I can enjoy it more. Without question, I feel the iPad Air is the quintessential iPad (for now, anyway). It is the iPad, I think, Steve Jobs probably always envisioned. Its combination of power, thinness, and lightness is simply fantastic. I can’t speak of it highly enough.

It’s so upsetting to see Microsoft denigrate the iPad because I know from personal experience just how capable and powerful it truly is. Extrapolating this point even further, look at what it does for children with special needs, as well as for iOS automation. More to the point, look at how Apple is promoting the iPad. These are not fluke events nor are they pie-in-the-sky concepts. These stories are real — depictions of real people using them in real life. Marine biologists are using iPads in the ocean. What other evidence does Microsoft need to fully realize that the iPad is convincingly and deservingly winning the hearts of millions of customers? Surely Microsoft can’t be so oblivious to the ways in which the iPad is transforming personal computing. And yet, their marketing dollars go toward an asinine campaign in which they stupidly belittle the iPad as “just a toy”. Compare and contrast Microsoft’s campaign to Apple’s, and consider their respective tablet’s place with consumers. The disparity is staggering, in accuracy and in resonance. If the ultimate goal of advertising is to sway consumers into buying product, Apple is Secretariat at the Belmont.

TechCrunch’s Matthew Panzarino gets it, offering this bit of great insight:

In many ways this is the realization of the dream for the original ‘tablet computers’ of Microsoft — something you can view with more or less irony depending on what chances you give the company of succeeding in a crowded space.

It’s Apple who’s fulfilling Microsoft’s vision, a fact that must not go over well in Redmond.

It seems to me that Microsoft is doing anything they can to try to stay relevant in the mobile space — unfortunately, if these Surface ads are any indicator, they’re failing miserably. I don’t mean to imply that the Surface in and of itself is a bad product; in fact, I actually rather like the keyboard cover idea, especially that of the Surface Pro. What’s bad is the way in which Microsoft is hoping to woo customers. Instead of touting the Surface on its own merits, Microsoft has misguidingly decided to degrade the iPad. Furthermore, the implicit notion that you must have Windows and Office to be productive is a sign that Microsoft is unable (unwilling?) to distance itself from its desktop-dominating past. But mobile is where the technology industry is now, and Microsoft is light years behind Apple and Google. These ads make Microsof look as if they’re in denial, as though they’re still who they once were. What does it say about a company’s faith in their product when they resort to baseless name-calling? The bottom line is these Surface ads reflect a serious cultural problem within Microsoft. Either they’re so full of themselves so as to believe their way is markedly better while being completely dismissive of the iPad’s success (i.e., “just a toy”), or they just plain can’t see the writing on the tablet market wall. (And lest we forget the disaster that is Windows 8.) Whatever the reason, it’s sad.

Microsoft just doesn’t get it, and probably never will.

Published by

Steven Aquino

Steven is a budding freelance technology writer, born and raised in the East Bay Area. He's a contributor to [*The Magazine*], [*Macworld*], [*TidBITS*], [*Tech.pinions*], and [Enhanced Vision]. Steven also writes regularly for his personal site, Steven’s Blog. Prior to venturing into the world of (paid) writing, Steven spent 11 years working for his local school district as a classroom aide to preschoolers with special needs. Steven's a cat person who loves sushi, and is fluent in American Sign Language.

12 thoughts on “Just A Toy”

  1. To me, the issue isn’t insulting the iPad. It can take care of itself. It is the implication that someone, YOU don’t understand your own needs and was somehow tricked into purchasing the wrong device.

  2. Microsoft has to let go off Apple obsession and focus on itself. Its jabs at Apple will only make thing worse for its own efforts to appear like a cool company. Every time I think of Microsoft, Ballmer’s circus screams on stage come to my mind. Him trying to appear like a cool dude gives a very wrong image. What Microsoft is doing is exactly what Ballmer is projecting about his own self image. He looks more like a bull in a china shop than a cool dude. iPad is for reading books, watching movies, sharing pictures, drawing by hand, browsing the internet, checking emails, playing games and demonstrating ideas. It is compact and elegant. It sure is a toy which has all the mentioned functionalities.

    Everyone is not too concerned about being productive 24 hours a day. People want to work when they can and enjoy their many activities during the rest of the time. Even during those, “productive” hours, many open windows where they do a lot of non-productive things. Many who work “long hours” are spending most of their time on social networks, blogs and other activities not concerned with work. They just make sure their work commitments are met and are doing things other than work most of the time. Or they are chatting with each other in production lines. For that much of “productivity” people have laptops and desktops. For the rest, they have tablets like the iPad. So iPad really is not for productivity and it surely is a toy for the adults and now children.

    So if Microsoft brought in its Surface and tried to project this holier than thou image of being a productive device, it sends a negative feeling in those who want to avoid being productive at all times. The laptop and desktop are already associated with that. And many associate those devices with their horrible managers who are very demanding. So laptops and desktops are now subliminally associated with stress at work that people want to get away from and get relief through their “toys”. Surface is yet another laptop (“God I do I have to work more?”).

    This is where the iPad comes in and finds its appeal. It can also be a productive device if needed. But it is mostly a toy that people desire for the reason stated above – keeping away from anything that reminds people of stress of work. So if Microsoft is reminding people of what they feel about work, then they are reinforcing the very belief that iPad is for staying away from evil managers and the stress that goes with it. “Productivity” is for managers. It is called “work” for the subordinates. “productivity” is associated with control and a measure of one’s performance. Those who work for others (who are the majority) hate that word. Many work to pay their bills, and not because they love their work. And by associating the Surface with the word, “Productivity” Microsoft is acting like the dreaded manager (“Get back to work and keep working”). Choice of words simply tells the mindset of people.

    So Microsoft is helping Apple sell more iPads as a result. This is something not obvious to Ballmer and his army of techies who know how software works but have no idea how human minds work.

    1. Or in simpler terms, the iPad is simply meant to be enjoyed ;). And with its purpose of enjoyment, when I do “productivity” on the iPad, it is productivity that I do for pleasure and entertainment, such as creating music in Garageband or drawing a scribble in Paper.

  3. My sense is Microsoft equates doing real work with using their office suite. What a narrow (and to me at least patronizing and arrogant) concept of what work is all about. Like so many others have reported, I have found work related uses for my iPad that i could not realistically consider any laptop form for. I define work as that which I do for my livelihood. If this notion of work is reasonable, i suspect it is a minority of work like circumstances that really needs any access to the office suite in its accomplishment.

  4. Roughly 2 years ago Microsoft fell into quicksand and they’ve been sinking further and further in since then. The name of the quicksand is Total Confusion and it’s uncertain whether MS will extricate themselves.

  5. It takes many years to get all the pieces lined up properly to execute a successful tablet strategy and the longer Microsoft takes to get started the further behind they are falling. I am sure that Apple loves the current marketing campaign as it confirms that Microsoft still doesn’t get it. Mobile is the future and the longer Microsoft dithers makes one wonder about how much success they will have in the consumer space in the coming years.

  6. This is sad. “Offended”, spewing “expletives”, “upset” because of an ad? The Kindle HDX ad (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QhTl00uili4) must have been even harder for you to take. Did it make you cry? Whatever it is that causes you to have this bizarre attachment to Apple, seek help. I like their products (generally). People like you are disturbing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *