This week Tim Bajarin, Bob O’Donnell and Jan Dawson discuss the controversy around the FBI’s request for Apple to unlock a terrorist’s iPhone, describe some concerns around the usage of virtual reality technologies, and debate the opportunities and challenges for web-based music services.
Click here to subscribe in iTunes.
If you happen to use a podcast aggregator or want to add it to iTunes manually the feed to our podcast is: techpinions.com/feed/podcast
Good Podcast this week. Three topics succinctly covered. My succinct comments:
Apple vs FBI:
LIke free speech, we shouldn’t abandon the principles of privacy protection, just because we don’t like what is being protected. We need to divorce the discussion of principles from the specific content, to have a reasonable discussion. Though many in the broader media won’t really be interested in reasonable discussion.
VR:
Being a skeptic, of the impact of VR, I think Gene Munster is off his rocker on this, or clickbaiting.
Streaming music:
Whether ad based, or fee based, the payout/stream is going to remain an incredibly tiny number. People harping on this number being small, either don’t understand how streaming works, or are being disingenuous. Streaming is more like a radio model than a sales model and the payout will always reflect that.
Even with the tiny payments, these companies aren’t making money. About where “all that money” is going. 70+% of the gross revenues go directly to the record companies, so you can’t expect a big increase by getting more out of streamers unless they get significantly more from customers, and I really don’t think these services could attract business at significantly more than $10/month.
It is OK for an Apple to run streaming as a service for it’s ecosystem, but this isn’t a business model I would invest as a standalone business. You are just a squeezed middleman that everyone complains about.
I’ve been trying to form an opinion about Apple vs FBI, or, rather, the more general issue.
What I’ve come up with for now:
1- this is the geek version of might makes right: “I can encrypt my stuff in a way you can’t break so go f*** yourself” is equivalent to “you want it ? come and get it” from The Mountain. Technology, just as strength, should serve society, not place one above it. The law shouldn’t stop at the entrance of a home because it’s fortified. Nor at the… entrance… of a phone.
2- there’s a side issue that involves the very fragile boundary between a) hacking, b) mass surveillance, and c) search warrants. I’d say the first 2 are noxious, the last one necessary and probably “good”. This being IT, anything that can be done once can probably be done a billion times with little extra effort. I think the way forward is to work on that issue: enable warrants in a way that doesn’t open the floodgates to hacking nor mass surveillance. That’s probably going to be complicated and somewhat onerous. As are labor, safety, consumer,… laws. Deal with it. It might help if all states including old democracies weren’t morphing into surveillance states right before our eyes. I actually think a lot of the reactions to the Apple-FBI case are transference about the surveillance state issue.
3- the specific Apple case is the edgiest of edge cases: if the phone were active, there are plenty of ways to hack it. If the phone used TouchID, a passcode wouldn’t be an issue, just fake the print; Apple can certainly make a one-off ROM to flash, if only because they can keep the phone on-premises while the FBI try their tricks.
Apple is making a dog and poney show of it, probably as a PR and diversion move: no one knows really what goes on inside their code, nor inside their servers, which is a dire issue in China (servers are hosted in a gov-friendly platform, code has most probably been “audited” by the gov, I’m sure they’re hard at work on the numerous vulnerabilities they spotted…). I think Apple are being “principled” in the US to make up for and obfuscate what they’re allowing in China.
Re: streaming, there is one key difference: with radio, the stream is out of my control, interrupted by ads, chit chat… with streaming, I choose what to listen to, and there’s no talking. Also there’s a scale difference: radio got favorable terms because it was used to promote albums. Now that nobody’s buying albums but remains streaming forever instead, the rationale for low radio/streaming prices goes away.
The minutia about what the service offers, is irrelevant to the rates charged.
Economics govern the rates. 70+% of the money is already going to the record companies, so there is no way to significantly squeeze a bigger cut from the streaming service.
The only question is how much can you squeeze from users? Do you think anyone will pay $100/month to turn those fractions of a cent/stream into whole pennies/stream?
Good post! We will be linking to this particularly great post on our site. Keep up the great writing
Good article with great ideas! Thank you for this important article. Thank you very much for this wonderful information.
But wanna say that this really is quite helpful , Thanks for taking your time to write this.
Copper scrap segregation Copper scrap processing and refining Copper scrap refining
Copper scrap assessment Expanded copper recycling Scrap copper wire prices
Copper recycling innovations Copper scrap reception for export Copper scrap legal compliance
Aluminium scrap billet production Aluminium scrap price index Aluminium recycling technologies
Metal scraps reclamation Ferrous material recycling associations Iron waste management services
Ferrous material sourcing, Iron and steel reuse, Metal scrap supply chain
Environmentally-friendly metal disposal Ferrous material buyback Iron scrap brokerage and trading
Ferrous material logistics services, Iron waste repurposing facilities, Metal recycling best practices
Scrap metal reclamation depot Aluminium scrap consultation services Aluminium scrap packaging
Metal reclaiming and reclaiming solutions, Aluminum cable scrap importers, Scrap metal trade negotiations
Metal scrap treatment Sustainable aluminum scrap recycling Scrap aluminum exporters/importers
Metal waste reforming, Recycle aluminum cables, Metal reclaiming center services
Metal repurposing centers Scrap aluminium supply and demand Process of recycling aluminum scrap
Scrap metal separation, Recycling regulations for aluminum cable scrap, Scrap metal processing
Urban metal scavenging Aluminium scrap import Scrap aluminium technological advancements
Scrap metal commerce, Aluminum cable insulation stripping, Scrap metal auctions
Scrap metal industry news Ferrous material retrieval Iron waste recycling center
Ferrous metal recover, Recycling iron scraps, Scrap metal relocation and recycling
Metal waste separation Aluminum scrap repurposing Aluminium recycling technology
Metal waste disposal center, Aluminum cable scrap recycling industry, Metal reclamation and recycling solutions
Metal recycling repurposing Ferrous material stakeholder engagement Iron reclamation and utilization solutions
Ferrous material traceability, Iron scrap procurement, Scrap metal reclaiming strategies
Scrap metal reprocessing and reclaiming Aluminium scrap reclamation technologies Aluminium scrap market analysis
Sustainable practices in metal recovery, Recycling aluminum conductor cables, Metal reclaiming and utilization solutions
Scrap metal reprocessing facilities Ferrous material pulverization Iron scrap reclamation yard
Ferrous material reutilization, Iron reclamation plant, Scrap metal sustainability standards
Metal reuse operations Aluminium die-casting scrap recycling Aluminium recycling process innovation
Scrap metal waste management, Aluminum cable scrap industry, Metal waste disposal
Scrap metal reprocessing yard Ferrous material shredders Iron recycle center
Ferrous metal collections, Iron scrap compacting, Metal reclaiming process
Scrap metal collection services Collection of aluminum scrap Aluminium scrap reuse
Scrap metal reuse, Aluminum cable salvage, Scrap metal analysis services
Metal recycling and restoration Ferrous material collection services Iron and steel recovery
Ferrous metal recycling forums, Scrap iron recovery facility, Scrap metal separation
Metal scrap supplier relationships Ferrous material weight measurement Iron recycling and reclamation center
Ferrous metal rejuvenation, Iron disposal solutions, Scrap metal recovery solutions
Copper smelting services Scrap copper dealer Scrap Copper refining
Metal waste treatment, Scrap copper dealer, Scrap metal reclamation yard collection
Scrap metal compaction Scrap metal exports Iron metal waste
Ferrous metal recovery center, Iron reprocessing services, Metal reclamation solutions
Copper scrap trade associations Copper scrap grading Metal reclaimer
Scrap Copper cable sorting, Scrap metal assessment services, Copper scrap trade regulations
Sustainable metal recovery, Copper scrap recycling services, Copper cable scrap disposal methods, Scrap metal inspection services
Metal waste recycling services Ferrous material recycling experimentation Iron waste reclaiming facility
Ferrous material recycling customer service, Iron recycling and repurposing center, Metal shredding services
Environmental metal disposal Ferrous material recycling market intelligence Iron recuperation
Ferrous metal cleaning, Iron waste reclamation and reprocessing, Logistics optimization for metal recycling
Recycling yard management Ferrous material community engagement Scrap iron transportation
Ferrous material process reviews, Iron waste reclaiming facility, Electronic waste recycling
Metal recycling solutions Ferrous material recycling air quality control Iron scrap recovery and recycling
Ferrous material data analysis, Iron and steel scrapping and reprocessing, Metal scrap recovery
Metal waste residue Ferrous material recovery Iron and steel reclamation
Ferrous material recycling energy efficiency, Iron scrap salvage center, Scrap metal remanufacturing