This week, Tim Bajarin, Jan Dawson, and Bob O’Donnell analyze the recent Microsoft hardware launch event, including their new Surface 2-in-1s and Lumia phones, and discuss new PC announcements from both Dell and HP.
Click here to subscribe in iTunes.
If you happen to use a podcast aggregator or want to add it to iTunes manually the feed to our podcast is: techpinions.com/feed/podcast
IMO you can’t blame OEMs for not innovating in this space. Before the original Surface Pro, there was Lenovo Yoga, and original Dell XPS 12.
Both innovative 2-in-1 designs, and IMO both providing superior usability to Microsoft’s floppy keyboard model.
Yet the media fell over itself fawning over Microsofts Surface Pro. And Microsoft threw millions (hundreds of?) at marketing. For a while it seemed like ever second commercial on TV was dancing and clicking magnetic keyboards.
This is not Microsoft showing OEMs how it is done. This is Microsoft sucking the remaining profit out of the OEM business.
No OEM has the resources to compete with Microsoft on R&D, and Marketing. Neither do they get the scale of free marketing Microsoft does for having a press conference. They also don’t have the advantage of controlling the software stack and building the HW and SW together.
Microsoft is just driving OEMs further into the commodity space.
I do agree it was a great show for Microsoft. They have finally learned the value of secrecy, and having a wow moment reveal.
That’s a hugely sane conclusion. The high-end is definitely where the profits are, and the explanation that Microsoft is leaving the low- and middle-end to the OEMs so everything is OK, is not very palatable. Under normal circumstances, I would definitely think that DELL and HP should be mad. Remember why Steve Jobs killed Mac clones; he killed them because they were not sticking to the low-end and were eating into Apple’s high-end customers.
https://youtu.be/a3MrpLyUOo8?t=34m25s
However then, why are HP and DELL going to sell Surface devices themselves? Why are they agreeing to sell Microsoft products that compete with their own high-end models, and eat into their own profits? Is there some strategic agreement, or is it that the demands from their corporate IT customers requires something that HP/DELL alone cannot provide? This is what I am struggling to fully grasp. I believe that understanding this will tell us the true intention of the Surface, and my hope is that the analysts at Techpinions will help us get insights into this.
“Why are they agreeing to sell Microsoft products that compete with their own high-end models, and eat into their own profits?”
I never understood that myself either.
Regarding the true intention Surface:
I think MS knows that PC (as in traditional PC) sales are at best stagnated, and at worst are declining. Therefore, that ultimately means there’s no money to be made selling Windows licenses. The only way to make good margins selling Windows is selling your own hardware, high end hardware (IOW, the Apple business model). The Surface is a strategy to hopefully salvage any margins lost from declining Windows license sales.
It comes from understanding this:
https://twitter.com/BenedictEvans/status/652719693699026944
The problem with going after Apple is that Apple only has a small fraction of PC sales. MS projects Surface sales to reach 3.5 billion USD/year which is only a few million units, about 1% of the global PC market. How far can they grow?
The Mac has only about 5% share of the global PC market, but it has been reported that they already own more than 90% of the high-end market. This suggests that 5% is the market share ceiling if you duplicate Apple’s strategy.
The question is then, why would Microsoft commit to a strategy that will only give them 5% market share at most, while infuriating the OEMs that supply the remaining 90%? It doesn’t make sense to me.
I wouldn’t say they’re going after Apple but more so they’re mimicking Apple’s strategy by going after the high-end of the Windows PC market. And yes, market share wise that is a low amount but it might not matter.
Right now, the Mac is approximately a $20 billion business for Apple. In calendar year, which is around 7.6%. MS’ revenue from OEM licensing was around $13.5 billion during all of 2014. So let’s say MS’ Surface division is able to also capture 7% market share. That would put the Surface business around the size as Apple’s Mac business.
Knowing that the future for making money off of licensing Windows is virtually nil, a 7% market share for the Surface division would offset any revenue lost from declining Windows OEM sales.
http://appleinsider.com/articles/15/10/08/mac-gains-marketshare-in-third-quarter-amid-continued-pc-market-slide
http://www.zdnet.com/article/microsofts-transition-to-the-cloud-picks-up-steam/
Now of course, that’s what I think the strategy is. Whether it works out that way or not is another story.
While I cannot rule out the possibility of Windows Surface succeeding immensely, it’s interesting to see people starting to do the math.
Gartner is calling 50,000 to 100,000 units of the Surface book in 2015Q4.
http://uk.businessinsider.com/microsoft-surface-book-sales-2015-10
Superb post however I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this topic? I’d be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit more.
Some really excellent info Sword lily I detected this.
You have noted very interesting details! ps decent web site.
click here
ラブドール販売 日本は女性に幅広い支援を提供するために女性のセックスロボットを提供します
Scrap Copper buyer
Copper radiator scrap buyer Copper scrap shipping Copper scrap regulations
Copper scrap export logistics Copper scrap industrial applications Scrap Copper recycling rates
Scrap Copper refining Electric motor copper scrap Copper scrap stockpiling
Scrap aluminum composition Aluminium scrap workplace guidelines Aluminium scrap price index
Scrap metal regulations Ferrous material salvage yard Iron scrap utilization and recycling
Ferrous material regulatory adherence, Iron waste repurposing depot, Scrap metal management solutions
Scrap metal baling services Scrap aluminium lifecycle assessment Aluminium scrap inventory
Metal reclamation facility services, Recycling aluminum cable for cash, Metal recycling management
Metal waste processing Aluminium scrap smelting Aluminium recycling consultancy
Metal waste scrapyard, Aluminum cable recycling machines, Scrap metal processing equipment
Metal scrap sales agreements Aluminum recycling legal compliance Aluminium packaging materials scrap recycling
Scrap metal prices, recycling aluminum cable, Scrap metal storage services
Scrap metal reclamation and recycling Melted aluminum scrap Scrap aluminium recycling feasibility
Metal scrap logistics, Recycling companies for aluminum cable, Metal waste recovery center
Metal reclamation and recovery solutions Ferrous metal recovery and reprocessing Scrap iron
Ferrous metal collection services, Iron scrap recollectors, Scrap metal reclaiming center
Scrap metal reclaiming management Aluminium scrap material handling Aluminum recycling technology
Metal waste reclamation facility, How to sell aluminum cable scrap, Scrap metal export documentation
Metal reclamation depot Aluminum scrap demand Aluminium recycling outreach programs
Scrap metal depots, Aluminum cable stripping tools, Metal handling services
Scrap metal decommissioning Ferrous material logistics Iron waste reclaiming facility
Ferrous metal recycling industry insights, Iron recovery center services, Scrap metal reclamation yard services
Metal cutting services Aluminium scrap catalyst processing Scrap aluminium reuse
Metal assessment services, Aluminum cable recycling centers, Industrial metal collection
Precious metal extraction Aluminium shredding Secondary aluminium recycling
Scrap metal reclamation operations, Sorting aluminum cable scrap, Scrap metal recovery and salvage
Metal residue recycling Ferrous material salvage Iron scrap trading
Ferrous scrap community engagement, Iron reclamation, Scrap metal exporters
Copper scrap auctions Copper extrusion recycling Scrap copper processing technology
Metal scrap recovery and recycling, Scrap copper market trends, Scrap metal recycling technologies
Scrap metal recovery and trading Ferrous material business operations Iron salvage
Ferrous metal reforming, Iron scrap utilization and trading, Scrap metal smelting
Copper scrap safety protocols Copper scrap product marketing Scrap metal safety protocols
Copper cable seller, Scrap metal pricing strategies, Copper scrap repurposing
Metal recycling salvage, Copper scrap import restrictions, Sustainable Copper cable recycling, Metal scrap reclamation
Scrap metal exporters Metal buyback program Iron scrap processing services
Ferrous material regulatory reporting, Iron reclamation solutions, Metal waste recovery center
Metal waste reforming Ferrous material sorting machinery Iron recovery yard center services
Ferrous material permits, Iron scrap disposal, Metal reprocessing yard
Scrap metal market competition Ferrous metal recycling innovations Iron recyclables processing
Ferrous material green practices, Iron waste reclamation, Scrap metal utili
Scrap metal residue recycling Ferrous material recycling cost-effectiveness Iron recycling solutions
Ferrous material community impact, Iron recycling industry, Metal waste stream management
Scrap metal Ferrous material yard management Iron recycling and recovery facility
Ferrous metal reclamation center, Iron waste reclamation services, Scrap metal reprocessing
Metal recycling and recovery facility Ferrous material data management Iron scrap transport
Ferrous metal reprocessing yard, Iron reclamation and recycling, Metal disassembling
Metal scrap brokerage Ferrous metal salvage and recycling Scrap iron reclamation
Ferrous metal exports, Iron reclamation, Scrap metal utilization centers