Understanding Apple’s Car Strategy

Not long after the original iPhone came out, I had a friend that was close to a major luxury brand auto maker. He also knew Steve Jobs well. He asked Steve if he was interested in talking to this company about finding a way to connect an iPhone to their entertainment system. From what I know of this meeting, I understand that, once Steve talked to this company, a lot of lights went on in his head about how Apple could work with auto makers to integrate Apple’s technology into future cars. Indeed, I suspect the roots of CarPlay can be traced to this meeting between Jobs and this auto company and, since then, Apple has courted and won support from just about every car maker to connect or integrate an iOS based device and their services into their current and future models.

Over the last few months, there has been a lot of chatter in the tech world about the idea that Apple is building a smart or driverless car and they have hired a series of top auto industry execs and engineers that would seem to bolster that rumor. The basic word on the street is Apple has a secret lab and has various car prototypes they are working on with the idea of creating an actual car that would have an Apple logo on it. While this speculation is interesting, count me as one of the serious skeptics on Apple actually making a branded car and selling it as a stand-alone vehicle regardless of how smart it could be. If they really wanted to get into the smart car business, just buy Tesla and work with them to add Apple’s intelligence and services to this vehicle. Clearly, they have the money to do this if it was strategic to their future.

I believe Apple’s plans are much grander than doing their own car. I keep coming back to that meeting. I can imagine that, as he thought through the original deal, he started formulating a big picture concept around a “what if” Apple could do more with car companies. Getting them to support the iPhone was a good first step, but over time, as iOS became an important OS in its own right and could handle music, entertainment, apps, sensors, cameras, etc., why not create the technology to make all cars smart and tie them to Apple apps and services.

I do believe Apple has car prototypes in their labs as some have suggested. But I believe they are there to help them create a radical smart/intelligent connected car architectural design that could be licensed to all car companies or be part of an integrated solution. They would work with car companies to customize future models that would be smarter and perhaps safer than any car on the market today. The operative word here is safer. In talks with car companies, it has become clear that, while they want to create smarter and safer cars, one of the challenges is to have a rich operating system that would allow them to handle all types of cameras, sensors and, perhaps equally important, is an operating system that can be tied to apps and services. For each company to try and create their own OS and convince developers to support it would be a difficult proposition. But what if Apple was able to present to car makers a rich solution behind iOS that connects sensors and cameras along with music, apps and services that helps them create a car that has multiple cameras as well as a 360 degree camera on top so there are never any blind spots. Sensors inside and out could be used to add additional safety features including collision avoidance and the like. Add to that the music and entertainment features that are part of iOS as well as the fact that iOS is a platform app developers could create apps for a car. Apple could create the architecture that sits at the center of all future smart cars.

From a strategic viewpoint, this follows Apple’s approach to the television. They are not making a smart TV but instead will bolster Apple TV by making it smarter, with richer content and create an SDK for developers to innovate around a new connected TV metaphor. I believe the car comes under this idea too. I don’t believe it is smart to make their own car, for dozens of reasons, in the same way it does not make sense for them to create their own TV. On the other hand, they could contribute greatly to all future smart cars and help extend Apple’s reach to another industry that would assure them new customers beyond their core today.

The big question is are the auto companies are willing to partner with Apple in this way? While many won’t for various reasons, I do believe Apple could win some of the luxury and mid-tier car makers who would want an Apple partnership to speed up the development of their own offerings and who understand creating their own OS and getting major developer support could be difficult. I think Apple would only need to have two or three key car companies work with them and integrate whatever they do into a smart car for Apple to have another disruptive product for the market. I suspect that, from a strategic viewpoint, that is the top line goal. But what if the car companies will not work with them and agree to adopt or integrate an Apple smart car architecture into their vehicles? Then, and only then, do I think Apple would default to doing their own branded car and take this bold step to become a car manufacturer.

I am convinced Apple still has some tricks up their sleeves when it comes to disrupting markets and they seem to have their eyes laser focused on the automobiles of the future. It will be fascinating to watch how this develops and if Apple can bring their magic to this important industry.

Published by

Tim Bajarin

Tim Bajarin is the President of Creative Strategies, Inc. He is recognized as one of the leading industry consultants, analysts and futurists covering the field of personal computers and consumer technology. Mr. Bajarin has been with Creative Strategies since 1981 and has served as a consultant to most of the leading hardware and software vendors in the industry including IBM, Apple, Xerox, Compaq, Dell, AT&T, Microsoft, Polaroid, Lotus, Epson, Toshiba and numerous others.

94 thoughts on “Understanding Apple’s Car Strategy”

  1. When Apple created the iPhone, it bundled the familiar into the unfamiliar, that is, phoning into browsing, navigating, etc.

    So what is, as a vehicle, is analogous to the phone? How could an Apple mo-car exist in a bundle of services, while retaining its driving function? Well, the mo-car could be bundled into a house. A house on wheels. The ultimate in mobility, for the highly mobile. The iHaul:

    * Can’t find a place in SF? Park on one of those big bridges.
    * Mean neighbors? Pick a new batch. Meetup with fellow travelers in a Walmart lot.
    * Commuting? Park next to the train station. Or fill your iHaul with colleagues and give them a Lyft.
    * On weekends, park next to your own piece of real estate, which is unwrecked by construction. Plant the whole plot.

    [Update: http://www.countryliving.com/h…]

    Weirdly relevant, I once doubled my income by living in a mobile trailer for a couple years. My employer was worried that I might leave town.

    1. Living out of your car – yeah brilliant idea everyone wants to be a modern day gypsy.

      Your attempt at sarcasm is pretty poor.

      1. Ha. Horace Dedui says that disruption can occur in new market sectors, as when small EU and Asian cars appeared in the US in the fifties. Everybody thought they were too small and flimsy to compete. They were a joke. Yes. And a live bit of sacrasm and critique of the US auto industry. And they got the last laugh.

        For those entering the workforce and professions, mobility is everything. Long ago, I doubled my salary by living in a mobile home for a couple years; my boss worried that I was ready to leave town.

  2. @bajarin

    : creating safety equipment for cars is a totally different area of expertise ,hardcore engineering challenge, not realistic to deeply integrate with the phone(due to safety reasons) while competing by r&d by car companies and their suppliers done over decades, not sure you can call it customer facing, no real value for the brand, etc.

    It’s more similar to something Google-X would do than Apple.

    So i’m not sure that’s the goal, on it’s own. Selling a car would make more sense.

    BTW: what do you think about Apple’s huge plan to curate and aggregate all media ? mind doing a post some day ?

    1. I want to see Apple’s Flipboard like approach in El Capitan before I do something about this..but that does seem to be one of their goals.

  3. “I believe the car comes under this idea too. I don’t believe it is smart to make their own car, for dozens of reasons, in the same way it does not make sense for them to create their own TV.”

    Totally right, and I’m glad somebody said it.

  4. Your belief means Apple will accept being a component supplier who will surrender control of the customer experience and thus control of their brand reputation to another company. It also doesn’t explain why Apple’s automotive hires include transmission and drivetrain designers and engineers.

  5. Interesting theory.

    However most of the automaker conglomerates already have self driving cars in development and likely far further along than Apples nascent program. There tech and experience in terms of automated safety features on already shipping vehicles is not something they are going to abandon and trust to a Silicon Valley company with zero experience in the auto safety field.

    I think the current tepid speed and commitment to CarPlay from the automakers is all the proof Apple needed that trying to sell an Apple solution to them will not work, and the way forward is to simply produce their own car.

    The comparison to AppleTV I don’t think is valid – due to the simple fact that TV makers don’t control what set top boxes can be plugged into their TVs.

  6. I recently tried CBD gummies because the earliest cbd gummies everything and they exceeded my expectations. The correctness was entertaining, and they helped me unwind and relax. My appetite noticeably decreased, and I felt a discrimination of all-embracing well-being. These gummies are for the time being a elementary in my self-care routine. Well advocate for a easy and balsamic experience.

  7. Heya! I’m at work surfing around your blog from my new iphone
    3gs! Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look
    forward to all your posts! Carry on the great work!

  8. This is really interesting, You’re a very skilled blogger.
    I’ve joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your
    excellent post. Also, I’ve shared your site in my social networks!

  9. My coder is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP.
    I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses.

    But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using Movable-type
    on various websites for about a year and am concerned about switching to another platform.
    I have heard good things about blogengine.net.
    Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress posts into it?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  10. After going over a few of the blog posts on your web page, I really appreciate your
    way of writing a blog. I book-marked it to my bookmark
    webpage list and will be checking back in the near future.
    Please check out my website as well and let me
    know your opinion.

  11. CBD, or cannabidiol, has been a engagement changer due to the fact that me. D8 Gummy I’ve struggled with hunger in return years and press tried sundry different medications, but nothing has worked as grammatically as CBD. It helps me to feel sang-froid and devil-may-care without any side effects. I also obtain that it helps with sleep and hurt management. I’ve tried some brands, but I’ve bring about that the ones that are lab tested and play a joke on a good position are the most effective. Complete, I importantly recommend CBD in behalf of anyone who struggles with worry, sleep issues, or dyed in the wool pain.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *