Growth cycles come in waves, some bigger than others. A wave swells and subsides. Companies who ride these waves risk being caught in calm waters if they do not or can not catch the next wave. Interestingly, we are watching this play out in real time with many public tech companies. We can run with the “peak” narrative for many different companies. When someone implies a company has peaked, they are saying that the first growth cycle, that first wave, may be subsiding. While no growth is easy, companies who catch these growth cycle waves benefit from the momentum. That is what I allude to when I say easy growth. For many public companies, the easy growth and the momentum is subsiding. These companies will now enter the phase where growing gets much more difficult.
Look at a number of public companies who are reporting less than stellar profits: Twitter, LinkedIn, Yelp, Google, to name a few. I view what is happening with many companies as a saturation of user bases. The products of these companies simply are not attracting new users at the rate they once were. Perhaps they have reached the maximum number of people for their service? In any case, for many of these companies their user growth has slowed and it’s showing in their quarterly earnings. The other observation I make is how the most profitable customer segments are already on the internet with a smartphone, PC, and/or a tablet. Google’s revenue growth for some time had a direct correlation with net new users getting on the internet each year. While that number is slowing, those coming online now have less disposable income than many present internet users. With the most profitable internet population already online, and humans having a limit on the amount of time they have and services they can consume, you can see why the market fundamentals are causing slowing growth for many companies. For these companies, there are a few strategies.
Milk Their Existing User Base
The most common strategy is to focus more on monetizing their existing base than on growth. Since many of these companies offer free services which are supported by advertising, it likely means more ads. Twitter is exploring more ways to incorporate more targeted ads into their timeline. Facebook is pushing the limits of advertising already but will continue to be aggressive in order to monetize their existing base of customers more efficiently. Google recently started putting ads in the Play Store as a means to increase advertising revenue from existing customers. These are a few examples where companies are trying to milk more value from their existing customer base.
For companies which offer a free service supported by ads this is a bit tricky. If the adverting is not deeply contextual and relevant, they risk annoying users and driving them to use the service less or in some cases not at all. I’ve written in depth about why I’m skeptical about the long term viability of free with ads and, while I question just how far that business model can truly take a company, it is certainly not going away. But as consumers mature and become more savvy, I do feel there are challenges to this business model due to the incentives it assumes and the potential impact on customer’s experiences. Time and time again, as markets mature, we see strong evidence of value being placed on consumer experience in ways that did not exist when the market was first maturing.
Monetizing an existing base will be a complex balance for many companies with free-but-ad supported models. More people use Facebook and Google on a regular basis than any other service which puts them in a strong position in terms of gathering the most data. Ultimately, both these companies, and many others, will have to walk a fine line as to not alienate customers due to extreme advertising initiatives.
Mergers and Acquisitions
The other telltale sign of a growth cycle slowing is the increase of mergers and acquisitions. Something we have clearly seen accelerate over the past few years. Smart companies acquire to get ahead of the slowing momentum, while others may just be waking up to the fact their growth wave is subsiding and are now looking for complementary assets to add to their revenue lines. Some companies may wait too long and end up as the ones who get acquired.
Given a number of market fundamentals which are becoming quite clear around this first initial internet growth cycle, I believe we will see an even more dramatic increase in mergers and acquisitions over the next 3-5 years. We can speculate all day on who needs to acquire who, but the general philosophy I like to use is to think through which companies will be stronger together than apart. The other is to look at who has the most cash, or valued/growth stock, to use.
My post last Monday articulated how difficult it will be for companies to go global. As companies like the ones I mentioned and the plethora of those in other markets like China and India hit their max customer base in their region, going global is a way to grow. However, I maintain they will need to buy their way in. e look at who has the biggest cash hoards and Apple, Google, and Microsoft fit the bill. But the ones to watch here in my opinion are Google and Microsoft. I believe some big acquisitions and industry consolidation are coming over the next five years.
All of this driven by the slowing growth cycle for many public companies. There is still a great deal of growth and momentum happening in the private company sector, but these are the types of companies primed to be acquired by the larger public companies who are, or should be, seeking growth in order to catch the next wave, whatever it may be.
There is another wave out there somewhere. It may take a while to arrive but there are certainly many “mini-waves” taking place within this industry as it continues to more deeply segment. We may not see another wave as big as the internet and mobile, and while growth is slowing, there is no question there is still a vast sea of opportunity.
4 thoughts on “When The Easy Growth is Over”
Do you get complementary chocolates with the complimentary assets ?
There’s another way not mentioned in this article, though it’s considerably riskier. Trying to invade or invent another product category or function that either complements or can become an extension of your current product is an option. Sometimes that happens through acquisitions and mergers, but sometimes that can be done internally.
That reminds me of a company…..
Interesting that you wrote about this. I recently published a similar piece that also discusses these challenges for large tech companies and the growth of M&A in the space: http://www.skillbridge.co/888/exponential-magazine/verizonaolmerger394