• ABOUT
  • CONTACT
  • BLOG
techpinions_logo_transparent techpinions__white_logo_transparent
  • TECH SECTOR PERFORMANCE HEATMAP
  • UPCOMING TECH IPOs
  • AI
  • Technology
  • Invest
  • Future
  • Opinions
  • Podcast
Reading: HP’s Never Ending Drama: Blame the Board
Share
TechpinionsTechpinions
Font ResizerAa
  • AI
  • Technology
  • Invest
  • Future
  • Opinions
  • Podcast
Search
  • AI
  • Technology
  • Invest
  • Future
  • Opinions
  • Podcast
Follow US
© Copyright 2026, Techpinions. All Rights Reserved.
Home » Blog » HP’s Never Ending Drama: Blame the Board
Technology

HP’s Never Ending Drama: Blame the Board

Steve Wildstrom
Last updated: September 21, 2011 9:00 AM
Steve Wildstrom
Published: September 21, 2011
Share

I don’t pretend to know what is going to happen next at Hewlett-Packard, but both Bloomberg and All Things Digital report that the board is meeting to consider ousting CEO Léo Apotheker and perhaps replace him with former eBay CEO (and current HP director) Meg Whitman.

The HP board has long had a well-earned reputation as one of the worst around, going back at least to the clumsy dumping of CEO Carly Fiorina and the ensuing scandal over spying on reporters to determine the source of boardroom leaks. But its performance in the last year puts it in a class by itself. A board shouldn’t have much involvement in the day-to-day running of a company, but it is responsible for oversight and strategic direction. The HP board has provided neither.

HP stock price chart

HP common stock price (from MarketWatch)

The big problems started a little over a year ago when then-CEO Mark Hurd got caught up in accusations of sexual harassment and an improper relationship with a contractor. The board decided Hurd hadn’t violated any policies on harassment or relationships, but fired him anyway for falsified expense reports. Hurd was widely disliked within HP for his slash-and-burn approach to improving earnings through stringent cost reduction, but he was a first rate operations executive who did make the trains run on time.

The choice of Apotheker seemed to signal a major strategic move by the board. For some time, HP had been a three-headed beast, comprising PCs and associated consumer electronics; enterprise servers, services, and software; and printing and imaging. from desktop inkjets to commercial Indigo digital presses. Apotheker, who had spent most of his career at German software giant SAP,  seemed to be chosen to focus on the enterprise business, especially since the board chose him over Personal Systems Group chief Todd Bradley and Imaging & Printing Group chief Vyomesh Joshi.

Apotheker made his big move this August when he announced that HP was killing the phone and tablet business acquired  (under Hurd) from Palm, was considering selling or spinning out the rest of Personal Systems, and was acquiring Autonomy, British business analytics software maker, for $10 billion. The Autonomy purchase was unanimously approved by the HP board according to the announcement; the other moves certainly must have had board approval as well.

But HP has been in a tailspin since the announcements. The stock price, which had been sinking since spring, cratered (though it rose 10% in intraday trading today on rumors of Apotheker’s departure.) Competitors such as Dell moved to poach corporate customers unnerved by the uncertain future of the PC division.  A fire sale of  the inventory of TouchPad tablets added to the ridicule. And the board, it would appear, panicked again.

In the circumstances, the choice of Whitman, would be an odd one. She has a solid record of accomplishment and has been cooling her heels at the venture capital firm of Kleiner Perkins Caulfield & Byers since losing a bid to become governor of California in 2010. But her business background is largely in consumer services and she would be taking over an HP that Apotheker has remade into an enterprise company.

Might such a move signal the board’s intention to reverse the enterprise direction? Possibly, though that would only lead to even more turmoil. The Autonomy purchase has been approved by both boards, though not yet by shareholders, and would probably be both very messy and very expensive to undo; such agreements typically carry heavy termination fees if the deal fails to close. Nothing irrevocable has been done yet to sell the Personal Systems Group, but the former palm operation is well and truly dead–the Apotheker rumors broke the day after HO began wholesale firing of webOS Global Business Unit employees.

However this turns out, we can expect more drama, and probably more missteps by the HP board. Somewhere in tech heaven, Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard are crying.

Millennials will Drive the Digital Transformation of the Workplace
Apple Is Doomed…Yet Again
Platform Wars: Some Things Will Never Change
Apple And The “Noah” Rule
Are Facebook’s Best Days Over or Ahead?
Previous Article An Apology
Next Article 2 Reasons HP Should Not Spin Off The PC Business

Listen to The Techpinions Podcast

Spotify Podcast

Join thousands of followers on X

X-twitter
techpinions_logo_transparent techpinions__white_logo_transparent
Insight, Perspective, and Analysis from influential and respected industry analysts.

About Techpinions

  • About
  • Contact
  • Editorial Policy
  • Financial Disclaimer
  • Follow us on X
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Topics

  • AI
  • Technology
  • Invest
  • Future
  • Opinions
  • Podcast
© Copyright 2026, Techpinions. All Rights Reserved.